<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What happened to Ruby? And why PHP is KING of the Web.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to teaching web designers PHP.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:56:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: breno</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-177054</link>
		<dc:creator>breno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-177054</guid>
		<description>what a laughable article...exactly what would be expected from lame &quot;I can do this!&quot; php programmers...

firstly, its a bit obvious GOOGLE trafic for &#039;php&#039; is enormous compared to ruby

* php has been around for much more
* php is the default web language, anyone wanting to have a take on php, doing one search for every single thing they&#039;re trying to do
* rails was launched in 2004, with a considerable maturity on 2.3.5
* rails users are more savvy, we know where our content is

now let&#039;s try some relevancy, instead of google, jobtrends
absolute: http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=ruby+on+rails%2C+php&amp;l=
the grap is WAY smaller, also, notice PHP doesnt have a consistent grow, and notice the big fall in jan 11....beautiful!

better yet, look at &#039;relative&#039; http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=ruby+on+rails%2C+php&amp;l=&amp;relative=1

just look at it! lol!!! really, look at it, I don&#039;t even need to say anything else, you should delete this post, man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a laughable article&#8230;exactly what would be expected from lame &#8220;I can do this!&#8221; php programmers&#8230;</p>
<p>firstly, its a bit obvious GOOGLE trafic for &#8216;php&#8217; is enormous compared to ruby</p>
<p>* php has been around for much more<br />
* php is the default web language, anyone wanting to have a take on php, doing one search for every single thing they&#8217;re trying to do<br />
* rails was launched in 2004, with a considerable maturity on 2.3.5<br />
* rails users are more savvy, we know where our content is</p>
<p>now let&#8217;s try some relevancy, instead of google, jobtrends<br />
absolute: <a href="http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=ruby+on+rails%2C+php&amp;l=" rel="nofollow">http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=ruby+on+rails%2C+php&amp;l=</a><br />
the grap is WAY smaller, also, notice PHP doesnt have a consistent grow, and notice the big fall in jan 11&#8230;.beautiful!</p>
<p>better yet, look at &#8216;relative&#8217; <a href="http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=ruby+on+rails%2C+php&amp;l=&amp;relative=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=ruby+on+rails%2C+php&amp;l=&amp;relative=1</a></p>
<p>just look at it! lol!!! really, look at it, I don&#8217;t even need to say anything else, you should delete this post, man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frederick</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-147430</link>
		<dc:creator>frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-147430</guid>
		<description>I have done 6 years of PHP development (mostly large web applications), but after I&#039;d completed the first project in Python in 2006 I decided I&#039;d never waste a second of my time for PHP again. I can tell you, I never looked back. I also picked up Ruby recently, and I find I like it a lot. 

For me writing code must be fun, and PHP (or languages like Java or C++) are just so painful compared to Python, Ruby and Objective C. With the latter, you get stuff done quickly, you can write tests more easily, and you can write elegant and robust code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done 6 years of PHP development (mostly large web applications), but after I&#8217;d completed the first project in Python in 2006 I decided I&#8217;d never waste a second of my time for PHP again. I can tell you, I never looked back. I also picked up Ruby recently, and I find I like it a lot. </p>
<p>For me writing code must be fun, and PHP (or languages like Java or C++) are just so painful compared to Python, Ruby and Objective C. With the latter, you get stuff done quickly, you can write tests more easily, and you can write elegant and robust code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Mischook</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-125337</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Mischook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-125337</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re kidding right?

This is killerPHP after all!

Ruby has many strong points as does PHP .. I&#039;ve spoken and written about the pro&#039;s and con&#039;s of each language on this site. 

Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re kidding right?</p>
<p>This is killerPHP after all!</p>
<p>Ruby has many strong points as does PHP .. I&#8217;ve spoken and written about the pro&#8217;s and con&#8217;s of each language on this site. </p>
<p>Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhiren</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-125334</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhiren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-125334</guid>
		<description>Hi guys, I&#039;m amateur in programming, I want to become a web developer. As I&#039;m new to this field I just want to know which language should I use ruby or php?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys, I&#8217;m amateur in programming, I want to become a web developer. As I&#8217;m new to this field I just want to know which language should I use ruby or php?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-115254</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 03:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-115254</guid>
		<description>Stefan is absolutely right. PHP continues to dominate on the Web. But the curious thing isn&#039;t Ruby or Rails, but how PHP continues to keep mind share. Zend Framework was pulled out of the trash heap a couple of years ago -- seemingly because Zend woke up and saw the threat -- but the documentation continues to be unreadable. The design changes to the framework verge on being willy-nilly and keeping up with the ad hoc version changes have made me a nervous wreck, since I&#039;m responsible for the stability of our deployments.  It clearly was not built upon a core architectural idea (well, in its original incarnation it kind of was, as a library, not a framework). The stuff grafted onto it is very much in keeping with the bolted on &#039;enhancements&#039; that have characterized PHP itself through the years.

I think symfony is a pretty solid piece of work, but its baroque character and heavy design must be turning away droves of PHPers into the arms of Code Igniter and CakePHP. Code Igniter has its place, but it won&#039;t be building enterprise applications at IBM. There is nothing in this world that demonstrates better the appeal of Rails than coding the same app in CakePHP. There are other frameworks that are probably much better than these, but this lot  are the ones with the &quot;I&#039;m just as good as Rails&quot; buzz. 

The naivete in the comments to this article is no credit to PHP. These people obviously aren&#039;t responsible for teams of developers, issues of scalability, or bearing the cost of maintaining legacy PHP code. We are flooded with the resumes of these self-taught lone wolves for whom PHP probably is an appropriate solution. 

Although we are a predominantly PHP shop, I am baffled by the seriousness being (apparently) given to PHP in larger organizations. There are precious few strong programmers among the droves of PHP riff-raff. I know because I read their resumes just about every day. I don&#039;t know where these supposed large PHP-based organizations are finding their talent. It can&#039;t be former Java programmers with degrees in Comp Sci.  

I have no doubt that companies younger than ours have done a better job of avoiding the sins of PHP in building scalable systems and can point to their successes in defense of it. But for us, it generally causes a lot of grief, and not a day goes by that I don&#039;t wish that we had made other choices, sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan is absolutely right. PHP continues to dominate on the Web. But the curious thing isn&#8217;t Ruby or Rails, but how PHP continues to keep mind share. Zend Framework was pulled out of the trash heap a couple of years ago &#8212; seemingly because Zend woke up and saw the threat &#8212; but the documentation continues to be unreadable. The design changes to the framework verge on being willy-nilly and keeping up with the ad hoc version changes have made me a nervous wreck, since I&#8217;m responsible for the stability of our deployments.  It clearly was not built upon a core architectural idea (well, in its original incarnation it kind of was, as a library, not a framework). The stuff grafted onto it is very much in keeping with the bolted on &#8216;enhancements&#8217; that have characterized PHP itself through the years.</p>
<p>I think symfony is a pretty solid piece of work, but its baroque character and heavy design must be turning away droves of PHPers into the arms of Code Igniter and CakePHP. Code Igniter has its place, but it won&#8217;t be building enterprise applications at IBM. There is nothing in this world that demonstrates better the appeal of Rails than coding the same app in CakePHP. There are other frameworks that are probably much better than these, but this lot  are the ones with the &#8220;I&#8217;m just as good as Rails&#8221; buzz. </p>
<p>The naivete in the comments to this article is no credit to PHP. These people obviously aren&#8217;t responsible for teams of developers, issues of scalability, or bearing the cost of maintaining legacy PHP code. We are flooded with the resumes of these self-taught lone wolves for whom PHP probably is an appropriate solution. </p>
<p>Although we are a predominantly PHP shop, I am baffled by the seriousness being (apparently) given to PHP in larger organizations. There are precious few strong programmers among the droves of PHP riff-raff. I know because I read their resumes just about every day. I don&#8217;t know where these supposed large PHP-based organizations are finding their talent. It can&#8217;t be former Java programmers with degrees in Comp Sci.  </p>
<p>I have no doubt that companies younger than ours have done a better job of avoiding the sins of PHP in building scalable systems and can point to their successes in defense of it. But for us, it generally causes a lot of grief, and not a day goes by that I don&#8217;t wish that we had made other choices, sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-114268</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 10:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-114268</guid>
		<description>Found this post while trying to find out what happened to ror, it seems no one is asking for ror contracting skills anymore, it&#039;s like it has been swept aside and totally forgotton.

Google trends show there never was much interest in it either, not even a spike. Not a momentary blip of interest:-

http://bit.ly/a1HcII</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this post while trying to find out what happened to ror, it seems no one is asking for ror contracting skills anymore, it&#8217;s like it has been swept aside and totally forgotton.</p>
<p>Google trends show there never was much interest in it either, not even a spike. Not a momentary blip of interest:-</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/a1HcII" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a1HcII</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asj</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-99515</link>
		<dc:creator>asj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-99515</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Java programmer and I say good riddance ;-)

I&#039;ve always known the thing had nothing behind it, and all the hype and predictions about it becoming the #1 platform and dethroning Java would come to nothing.

Now Scala, on the other hand, now THAT&#039;S a rocking language (on the JVM of course) :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Java programmer and I say good riddance <img src='http://www.killerphp.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always known the thing had nothing behind it, and all the hype and predictions about it becoming the #1 platform and dethroning Java would come to nothing.</p>
<p>Now Scala, on the other hand, now THAT&#8217;S a rocking language (on the JVM of course) <img src='http://www.killerphp.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaroukh</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-97003</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaroukh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-97003</guid>
		<description>PHP wil l (unfortunately) never die. Because it attracts the kind of people who are unable to understand anything even slightly more demanding than &quot;echo $_REQUEST[&#039;message&#039;]&quot;...
This kind of people will drive PHP, write the terrible PHP-documentation and their laughable &quot;frameworks&quot; for ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHP wil l (unfortunately) never die. Because it attracts the kind of people who are unable to understand anything even slightly more demanding than &#8220;echo $_REQUEST['message']&#8220;&#8230;<br />
This kind of people will drive PHP, write the terrible PHP-documentation and their laughable &#8220;frameworks&#8221; for ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Vogl</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-94292</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Vogl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-94292</guid>
		<description>Sorry Sir, but you are slandering like a blabbermouth. 

There isn&#039;t any „crash-o-matic” caused by Ruby or Rails themselves. You&#039;re quoting Twitter crashes - ridiculous, really. It&#039;s so obvious that I don&#039;t want to comment on this any more – but I can tell you for sure that you should not blame neither Rails nor Ruby solely for this.


„But, there were a lot of holes in Ruby”

To go with your polemics: You mean holes on sense of security holes of PHP? ;-) 

„Crucial libraries and functionality that PHP’rs took for granted, the Ruby guys could only dream of”

Ah, missing features. Bloated core &amp; friends.
Please just compare the functionality and quality(!) provided by RubyGems and Rails plugins to your beloved PHP PEAR… I just don&#039;t need to say anymore, do I?


„Or they could patch it up with some C code. Ouch!”

Ouch. For ignoring PECL and that facts, that 1.) writing C code is sometimes annoying but not indictable and 2.) the PHP guys do more than the Ruby guys ;-)



Last but not least... even if Rails is the killer app of Ruby – you shouldn&#039;t compare them with PHP in a single sentence.
Compare Typo3, Drupal, Symfony (ha-ha) with some Rails applications instead and have a separate look at PHP and Ruby. And last but not least – go to GitHub and browse some Rails related code (including the various plugins). You&#039;ll see that high quality coding with evolved patterns (finite state machines, nested sets) is made so easy due to a great community and the availablity of great plugins. As easy as PHP enables someones „webdesigner nephews“” to blow up the web with their PHP crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Sir, but you are slandering like a blabbermouth. </p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t any „crash-o-matic” caused by Ruby or Rails themselves. You&#8217;re quoting Twitter crashes &#8211; ridiculous, really. It&#8217;s so obvious that I don&#8217;t want to comment on this any more – but I can tell you for sure that you should not blame neither Rails nor Ruby solely for this.</p>
<p>„But, there were a lot of holes in Ruby”</p>
<p>To go with your polemics: You mean holes on sense of security holes of PHP? <img src='http://www.killerphp.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>„Crucial libraries and functionality that PHP’rs took for granted, the Ruby guys could only dream of”</p>
<p>Ah, missing features. Bloated core &amp; friends.<br />
Please just compare the functionality and quality(!) provided by RubyGems and Rails plugins to your beloved PHP PEAR… I just don&#8217;t need to say anymore, do I?</p>
<p>„Or they could patch it up with some C code. Ouch!”</p>
<p>Ouch. For ignoring PECL and that facts, that 1.) writing C code is sometimes annoying but not indictable and 2.) the PHP guys do more than the Ruby guys <img src='http://www.killerphp.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Last but not least&#8230; even if Rails is the killer app of Ruby – you shouldn&#8217;t compare them with PHP in a single sentence.<br />
Compare Typo3, Drupal, Symfony (ha-ha) with some Rails applications instead and have a separate look at PHP and Ruby. And last but not least – go to GitHub and browse some Rails related code (including the various plugins). You&#8217;ll see that high quality coding with evolved patterns (finite state machines, nested sets) is made so easy due to a great community and the availablity of great plugins. As easy as PHP enables someones „webdesigner nephews“” to blow up the web with their PHP crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Mischook</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/what-happened-to-ruby-and-why-php-is-king-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-94239</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Mischook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=173#comment-94239</guid>
		<description>It is reasonable to assume that with certain things, Ruby is superior to PHP. And I am sure with other things, Python is superior to Ruby ... and it goes on.

The above blog post aside, my belief in PHP goes way beyond the core language; I constantly blend business considerations along with nerd considerations. 

... I think that perspective is lost on most programmers. 

For example, I think PHP is much easier for web designers to learn than Ruby or Python and I think that the PHP community has a few key products out there that are supremely useful to web designers who want to take their skills/solutions to the next level. I am talking about:

- wordpress
- drupal

etc ..

So I look at PHP as being a stepping stone, a compromise for those who want to implement some dynamic capabilities into their sites BUT who may not want to become application developers. That said, with MVC frameworks like Zend, CakePHP etc ... PHP also gives users the ability to write sophisticated applications.

I hope that makes sense.

Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is reasonable to assume that with certain things, Ruby is superior to PHP. And I am sure with other things, Python is superior to Ruby &#8230; and it goes on.</p>
<p>The above blog post aside, my belief in PHP goes way beyond the core language; I constantly blend business considerations along with nerd considerations. </p>
<p>&#8230; I think that perspective is lost on most programmers. </p>
<p>For example, I think PHP is much easier for web designers to learn than Ruby or Python and I think that the PHP community has a few key products out there that are supremely useful to web designers who want to take their skills/solutions to the next level. I am talking about:</p>
<p>- wordpress<br />
- drupal</p>
<p>etc ..</p>
<p>So I look at PHP as being a stepping stone, a compromise for those who want to implement some dynamic capabilities into their sites BUT who may not want to become application developers. That said, with MVC frameworks like Zend, CakePHP etc &#8230; PHP also gives users the ability to write sophisticated applications.</p>
<p>I hope that makes sense.</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

