<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Programmers should learn to be language agnostic.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killerphp.com/articles/programmers-should-learn-to-be-language-agnostic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/programmers-should-learn-to-be-language-agnostic/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to teaching web designers PHP.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:44:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Mischook</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/programmers-should-learn-to-be-language-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-97594</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Mischook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=174#comment-97594</guid>
		<description>Hi Iain:

You said:

&quot;I don’t think that there is anything that PHP does that Ruby can’t do.&quot;

I agree. And I also think Ruby&#039;s pure object oriented nature is a pleasure to work with. 

That said, for me though, I still tend to favor PHP because of it&#039;s penetration into the marketplace. For a working web designer/developer, the PHP world has so many options when it comes to ready-to-go projects:

- blog software
- cms
- forums
- ecommerce solutions

etc ...

Just too much to ignore IMHO.

Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Iain:</p>
<p>You said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t think that there is anything that PHP does that Ruby can’t do.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree. And I also think Ruby&#8217;s pure object oriented nature is a pleasure to work with. </p>
<p>That said, for me though, I still tend to favor PHP because of it&#8217;s penetration into the marketplace. For a working web designer/developer, the PHP world has so many options when it comes to ready-to-go projects:</p>
<p>- blog software<br />
- cms<br />
- forums<br />
- ecommerce solutions</p>
<p>etc &#8230;</p>
<p>Just too much to ignore IMHO.</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iain</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/programmers-should-learn-to-be-language-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-97553</link>
		<dc:creator>iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=174#comment-97553</guid>
		<description>If only it were that black and white. In software development it&#039;s not always an obvious match. 

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s just what&#039;s the best tool for the job, but also about what is the best tool for the people doing the job. Inevitably, that is going to play a huge part in the success or failure of the project too.

I am very happy with Ruby, mostly because of it&#039;s syntax and libraries. I can express myself very accurately in Ruby. If you have a team of PHP programmers then PHP is probably the better choice.

I don&#039;t think that there is anything that PHP does that Ruby can&#039;t do.

Not invalidating your three points, though, they are true. I think that programmer happiness and inspiration is more important than those three points when it comes to solving problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only it were that black and white. In software development it&#8217;s not always an obvious match. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s just what&#8217;s the best tool for the job, but also about what is the best tool for the people doing the job. Inevitably, that is going to play a huge part in the success or failure of the project too.</p>
<p>I am very happy with Ruby, mostly because of it&#8217;s syntax and libraries. I can express myself very accurately in Ruby. If you have a team of PHP programmers then PHP is probably the better choice.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that there is anything that PHP does that Ruby can&#8217;t do.</p>
<p>Not invalidating your three points, though, they are true. I think that programmer happiness and inspiration is more important than those three points when it comes to solving problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Mischook</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/programmers-should-learn-to-be-language-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-95858</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Mischook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=174#comment-95858</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

You are correct. Thanks for pointing that out.

Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>You are correct. Thanks for pointing that out.</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.killerphp.com/articles/programmers-should-learn-to-be-language-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-95855</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerphp.com/articles/?p=174#comment-95855</guid>
		<description>Hate to be a stickler for grammar, but I think poor word usage can convey an impression of the writer the writer may not deserve.

&quot;Irregardless&quot; means &quot;not regardless&quot;.  So I think you mean simply &quot;Regardless of my intent...&quot; in your third paragraph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to be a stickler for grammar, but I think poor word usage can convey an impression of the writer the writer may not deserve.</p>
<p>&#8220;Irregardless&#8221; means &#8220;not regardless&#8221;.  So I think you mean simply &#8220;Regardless of my intent&#8230;&#8221; in your third paragraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
